Barriers to Effective Communication Process - 1100 Words

Barriers to Effective Communication Process (Research Paper Sample) Content: Barriers to Effective Communication ProcessNameInstitutionIntroductionCommunication can be defined as the process of passing information from one source to another. It involves many elements; from the sender, encoder, medium, decoder and finally the receiver. If one of these elements is interfered with, then the communication process is broken, and that is the point where communication barrier comes in. (Rai, Urmila and S.M. Rai, 2009). Effective communication entails having a smooth flow of information from the source to the very last person that is, the receiver. In this case, any distortion along the way means that by the time it reaches the target, it has been altered. Any alteration on the original information leads to wrong interpretation. These are otherwise known as barriers to effective communication. It is, therefore, the responsibility of everyone within the organization to ensure that they follow the right channel put in place for the flow of information.C ommunication BarriersInformation is meaningful if and only if both the sender and the receiver interpret a message in the same way; that is to say, message sent by the sender is interpreted in the same manner as the receiver. According to Burtis, J. O, Turman P.D (2006), there are several impediments in the smooth flow of information that include the following:Poor planning: before communication is relayed, there should be formidable structures to ensure that there is the proper formulation of the message and its interpretation; meaning poor planning leads to the poor release of information thus wrong interpretation. A poorly delivered message can cause the receiver not to respond since the sender has failed to present the message in the correct format.Poor listening and premature conclusions: the receiver of the massage may not be able to absorb every information being sent, therefore, ends up making own conclusion. This leads to wrong interpretation of the message and making own judgment. Distrust, threat and fear: if the person relaying the information is not trusted, then people will use any means possible to avoid giving or receiving information as they have less credibility from the information source. Information overload: if there is too much information being relayed at the same time, then people are bound to be mixed up with lots of information. For example, if one receives information from different sources like, telephone calls, emails, television, newspapers and others, they can be a barrier to communication since they cause interruptions. Perception and attitude: if the person relaying the message has a wrong attitude, then the listeners will distort or filter the information, and this prevents the receiver from getting true picture. Differences in status: Communication between subordinate and superior is always treated with suspicion regardless of how open manager is, the employees tend to be hesitant to share information. Language and culture: Within an organization, language can be an impediment to effective communication as different individuals interpret information in different ways. Some cultures are open to communication while others are not; that is to say, releasing information as per ones culture can be wrongly interpreted. Semantic distortions: they are brought about by having same words or expressions but are interpreted in different ways. The divergence of words being used in communication can bring out different meaning; jargons and terminologies used can make sense or fail to make sense thus hindering effective communication. Emotional disconnect: effective communication requires openness of both the listener and speaker this means if there is no connection between listener and the person conveying the message then the bond between them will be disconnected.Noise: this involves an external or internal disruption that hinders one from listening or conveying the intended message. For example, self-talking, b ody language and gestures keeps us from being focused and this destructs ones attention. Noise can also come from blast and traffic.Assumptions: Sometimes a message is designed in such a way that, the sender assumes the reader will understand the message, but it is interpreted otherwise hence, sending the wrong signal.Effective Implementation of CommunicationAccording to Gerson, S.J., Gerson, S. M. (2007); to have an effective communication, it is up to the entire organization to come up with proper structures for implementation. Communication is not one-sided event, but it is an act of conveying information for the purposes of creating a mutual understanding among employees. Effective communication should always start with top management therefore; all stakeholders should be incorporated. The top management should emphasize on having clear information to its support staff whereas the employees should always follow the clear channels put in place for effective communication. Ineffe ctive communication structure leads to suspicion among the various levels of the organization. It is, therefore, the responsibility of everyone to ensure that barriers to effective communication are eliminated.Law Enforcement and StrikeLaw enforcement officers are not allowed to participate in the strike, this is due to the nature of their job; they are supposed to suppress riots, prevent crimes, secure public proper... Barriers to Effective Communication Process - 1100 Words Barriers to Effective Communication Process (Research Paper Sample) Content: Barriers to Effective Communication ProcessNameInstitutionIntroductionCommunication can be defined as the process of passing information from one source to another. It involves many elements; from the sender, encoder, medium, decoder and finally the receiver. If one of these elements is interfered with, then the communication process is broken, and that is the point where communication barrier comes in. (Rai, Urmila and S.M. Rai, 2009). Effective communication entails having a smooth flow of information from the source to the very last person that is, the receiver. In this case, any distortion along the way means that by the time it reaches the target, it has been altered. Any alteration on the original information leads to wrong interpretation. These are otherwise known as barriers to effective communication. It is, therefore, the responsibility of everyone within the organization to ensure that they follow the right channel put in place for the flow of information.C ommunication BarriersInformation is meaningful if and only if both the sender and the receiver interpret a message in the same way; that is to say, message sent by the sender is interpreted in the same manner as the receiver. According to Burtis, J. O, Turman P.D (2006), there are several impediments in the smooth flow of information that include the following:Poor planning: before communication is relayed, there should be formidable structures to ensure that there is the proper formulation of the message and its interpretation; meaning poor planning leads to the poor release of information thus wrong interpretation. A poorly delivered message can cause the receiver not to respond since the sender has failed to present the message in the correct format.Poor listening and premature conclusions: the receiver of the massage may not be able to absorb every information being sent, therefore, ends up making own conclusion. This leads to wrong interpretation of the message and making own judgment. Distrust, threat and fear: if the person relaying the information is not trusted, then people will use any means possible to avoid giving or receiving information as they have less credibility from the information source. Information overload: if there is too much information being relayed at the same time, then people are bound to be mixed up with lots of information. For example, if one receives information from different sources like, telephone calls, emails, television, newspapers and others, they can be a barrier to communication since they cause interruptions. Perception and attitude: if the person relaying the message has a wrong attitude, then the listeners will distort or filter the information, and this prevents the receiver from getting true picture. Differences in status: Communication between subordinate and superior is always treated with suspicion regardless of how open manager is, the employees tend to be hesitant to share information. Language and culture: Within an organization, language can be an impediment to effective communication as different individuals interpret information in different ways. Some cultures are open to communication while others are not; that is to say, releasing information as per ones culture can be wrongly interpreted. Semantic distortions: they are brought about by having same words or expressions but are interpreted in different ways. The divergence of words being used in communication can bring out different meaning; jargons and terminologies used can make sense or fail to make sense thus hindering effective communication. Emotional disconnect: effective communication requires openness of both the listener and speaker this means if there is no connection between listener and the person conveying the message then the bond between them will be disconnected.Noise: this involves an external or internal disruption that hinders one from listening or conveying the intended message. For example, self-talking, b ody language and gestures keeps us from being focused and this destructs ones attention. Noise can also come from blast and traffic.Assumptions: Sometimes a message is designed in such a way that, the sender assumes the reader will understand the message, but it is interpreted otherwise hence, sending the wrong signal.Effective Implementation of CommunicationAccording to Gerson, S.J., Gerson, S. M. (2007); to have an effective communication, it is up to the entire organization to come up with proper structures for implementation. Communication is not one-sided event, but it is an act of conveying information for the purposes of creating a mutual understanding among employees. Effective communication should always start with top management therefore; all stakeholders should be incorporated. The top management should emphasize on having clear information to its support staff whereas the employees should always follow the clear channels put in place for effective communication. Ineffe ctive communication structure leads to suspicion among the various levels of the organization. It is, therefore, the responsibility of everyone to ensure that barriers to effective communication are eliminated.Law Enforcement and StrikeLaw enforcement officers are not allowed to participate in the strike, this is due to the nature of their job; they are supposed to suppress riots, prevent crimes, secure public proper...

Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome

You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video Rejected by B-Schools 5 Steps to Change the Outcome You didn’t get into any of the programs you applied to. Understandably, you are pretty upset about it, and wondering a few things: Should I reapply? If so, which programs should I reapply to, and when? Should I apply to some different schools? The decision to deny an applicant is usually a combination of factors, but these are some of the things you should do to objectively assess your candidacy, and help you decide whether an MBA reapplication is the right decision for you. 1. Analyze your profile. Were you really qualified for the programs that you applied to? Were your test scores really high enough? Did you have enough work experience or extracurricular activities to showcase? You’ve got to call a spade a spade sometimes (or always, really). If you had weak test scores, low grades, or inadequate work experience either quantitatively or qualitatively, then you’re just not going to measure up at top schools. In essence, if you fail to convince the school that you can handle the work or represent the school well to recruiters you’re toast. Tip: Assuming you were rejected in R1, apply R2/R3 to different, less competitive programs OR reapply next year to the same schools after you’ve strengthened your profile (improved test scores, earned A’s in additional coursework, assumed leadership roles, initiated something of consequence, increased professional responsibilities, strengthened extracurriculars, etc.). 2. Evaluate your application. This is easier said than done; it’s hard to objectively judge something that you’ve put your heart and soul into. But it needs to be done. Did you present your qualifications in the best light? Were your application essays well written and persuasive? Did you interview well? If these aspects of your application were okay, then what went wrong? If you’re lucky enough to receive application feedback from the school(s) that dinged you, then you should carefully review, evaluate, and act based on that feedback. If you plan on reapplying, this information is crucial. B-schools seek applicants with multiple talents, and you need to demonstrate that you’ve got them. Competitive stats are frequently necessary for admission, but not sufficient on their own. For example, if you have the stats but didn’t show the soft skills, didn’t show fit, didn’t explain why you need the degree from this particular program, or failed to present your achievements in an authentic, thoughtful, and compelling way, then the answer could easily still be DECLINE. The admissions committee may ding you for lacking such qualifications, even though you may have them, because you failed to present them effectively. Tip: Use a combination of anecdotes and analysis to present your unique story and perspective while demonstrating fit and revealing the character traits top MBA programs seek. Show a history of contribution so that evaluators can easily see that you will be a contributor when you arrive on their campus. Make sure all written components are articulate and compelling to demonstrate your communications skills. Introduce yourself as a real human being that they will want to meet in person at an interview. Use this tip to apply R2/R3, or reapply next year with a stronger application that clearly highlights your qualifications, fit, and goals. 3. Examine your school choices. Did you apply to programs based on your post-MBA goals and qualifications? Did you aim too high? Or is it possible that you were qualified for these programs but that you didn’t properly portray fit? Did you focus too heavily on rankings and brand instead of showing that given your goals and qualifications and the school’s strengths and culture, you and your target school are a match made in heaven? Every once in a while we hear from prospective clients who approach the idea of an MBA degree from a very narrow viewpoint. â€Å"If I don’t get into Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton, there is no point in me getting an MBA.† In 99% of the cases, the applicants, blinded by these eminent schools’ dazzling brands and reputations, miss opportunities at other programs. Furthermore, with that kind of thought process, those applicants have a miserable time showing fit. Just how deeply do you think an applicant like this can express why a particular school is â€Å"right† for them? It is very easy for admissions committee members to see through the shallowness of reputation as the sole reason for wanting to attend. If you didn’t take the time to either visit the campus or speak to current students or alumni, you wouldn’t have had much to say about your fit with the program. Tip: When you reapply, make sure you have logical and credible reasons for needing to attend your target school. Make sure your school choice and career goals are a strong match. Visit campus, if possible, and see the program in action. 4. Did you apply early in your target schools’ application process? For most programs â€Å"early† translates into an application submitted during or prior to the January deadlines. Round 1 (and at the latest round 2) is the ideal time to apply if your profile is well-represented, either demographically (Indian IT male, for example), or professionally (consultant). By the time round 3 rolls around, the incoming class profile has taken shape to a certain extent, and at that point the admissions committee is more interested in bringing in outliers. Tip: Analyze your profile as it relates to others in the applicant pool, and apply as early as possible in the next application cycle without compromising your application’s quality. 5. Decide What You’re Going to Do Differently There is one approach you should NOT take: The same one you took last time. What are you going to change about your strategy in approaching the process? How are you going to execute better? Tip: Using the tips above, put together an action plan to change and submit a stronger application than you did the first time around.   And let’s face it, it’s hard to be objective about your application. If you’re unsure why you were rejected or what you can do to change the outcome next time around, contact us for an MBA Application Review. An objective, knowledgeable MBA admissions expert will evaluate your qualifications and your dinged application and it will cost you a lot less money (and time) than another bunch of rejected applications. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped business school applicants gain acceptance to top programs. Our outstanding team of MBA admissions consultants features former business school admissions directors and professional writers who have guided our clients to admission at top MBA, EMBA, and other graduate business programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, INSEAD, London Business School, and many more.  Want an MBA admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ Best MBA Programs: A Guide to Selecting the Right One, a free guide †¢ Take 2: How to Reapply Right to Business School, a free webinar †¢ How to Reapply Successfully to Top MBA Programs, a short video